Fill in the form below and we will contact you shortly to organised your personalised demonstration of the Noggin platform.
An integrated resilience workspace that seamlessly integrates 10 core solutions into one, easy-to-use software platform.
The world's leading integrated resilience workspace for risk and business continuity management, operational resilience, incident & crisis management, and security & safety operations.
Explore Noggin's integrated resilience software, purpose-built for any industry.
Emergency Management Software
Published February 2, 2024
For emergency response agencies reliant on volunteers, ensuring the reliable participation of those volunteers is critical to delivering services effectively. Unfortunately, it’s not that easy, as many incident managers will attest.
It’s indisputable that volunteers, especially informal, short-term volunteers (see table below), bring innovation, skills, and enthusiasm, but they also introduce a number of operational risks to the response effort, especially as their excitement wanes throughout the emergency management lifecyclei.
Types of volunteers in emergencies and their functions | |
Anticipated individual volunteers |
|
(Formal or affiliated) Anticipated organization volunteers |
|
Spontaneous individual volunteers |
|
(Informal or unaffiliated) Spontaneous organization volunteers |
|
Source: Whittaker, McLennan, Handmer, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
For one, these short-term volunteers tend to lack preestablished relationships with emergency managers, which makes it difficult for dispatchers to verify the trainings and credentials of their volunteers. As a result, incident managers are unable to match the skills of their volunteers to the appropriate service area; the mission suffers in consequence.
More alarming still, volunteer reliability itself is a major concern, as scholars noteii. We read numerous anecdotes from managers lamenting the failure of volunteers to complete explicitly agreed-upon assignments. Often, volunteers just don’t show up.
Volunteer unreliability could be a function of volunteers having competing priorities. After all, volunteers have fulltime jobs (or other pressing commitments). They, therefore, tend to lend their services during rest and recovery periods. In the event of a protracted emergency, for instance, volunteer scheduling conflicts can crop up, and volunteers become unavailable for assignments.
Meanwhile, agencies have little way of gauging whether volunteers will be available and, therefore, can’t plan accordingly. Irrespective of the source of the problem, the lack of volunteer dependability robs emergency agencies time, money, and manpower, all which jeopardize the response effortsiii. What’s to be done?
In and of itself, resource management technology can’t make your volunteer workforce more reliable. But it can certainly help you sort out and pick the most reliable volunteers more efficiently. How exactly?
The resource assignments feature in Noggin OCA, our all-hazards incident management platform, gives emergency managers the ability to easily find and rank the best, most capable candidates, communicate with and confirm those candidates, as well as create and manage rosters. This functionality is part of a more comprehensive solution to manage the selection, assignment, dispatch, and rostering of people and assets.
What’s more, Noggin OCA adds much-needed intelligence to the selection and dispatch of candidates, by letting managers factor in criteria for the role, like reliability, capability, proximity, and availability. Managers can even choose whether a given criterion is essential or optional to candidate evaluation and selection. The system then automatically ranks candidates based on those weightings.
For managers, the ranking system itself is readily understandable. When short-listing candidates for a role, your match will be represented with a clear 5-star rating, a highly intuitive way to rank your candidates from best to worst.
Of course, technology won’t do everything to solve your volunteer reliability issues, but it can go a long way toward making the selection of dependable candidates easier and more efficient, all of which will improve the performance of your responders in the field.
i Joshua Whittaker, Blythe McLennan, John Handmer, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction: A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420915300388.
ii Tim Vantilborgh and Stijn Van Puyvelde, International journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations: Volunteer Reliability in Nonprofit Organizations: A Theoretical Model. Available at https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journal/volunteer-reliability-in-nonprofit-organizations-atheoretical-model-dOdjfNYOby?key=springer.
iii Ibid.