Fill in the form below and we will contact you shortly to organised your personalised demonstration of the Noggin platform.
An integrated resilience workspace that seamlessly integrates 10 core solutions into one, easy-to-use software platform.
The world's leading integrated resilience workspace for risk and business continuity management, operational resilience, incident & crisis management, and security & safety operations.
Explore Noggin's integrated resilience software, purpose-built for any industry.
Safety Management
Updated April 19, 2024
Poor mental health conditions, occurring irrespective of whether work has causally contributed, exert a negative effect on a person’s cognitive, behavioral, emotional, social, and relational wellbeing and functioning, as well as their physical health, personal identity, and wellbeing as related to worki. As a result, mental illness remains one of (if not) the leading causes of sickness absence and long-term work incapacity.
Indeed, one’s capacity to participate in work can be impaired through a reduction in productivity and performance, reduction in the ability to work safely, or difficulty in retaining or gaining work. Presenteeism (or lost productivity, where the largest financial costs lie), absenteeism, and staff turnover affect both workers and employers and, in turn, the society’s economy.
On this score, the numbers are stark.
The most common mental disorders, i.e., depression and anxiety, are estimated to cost the global economy USD 1 trillion per annum. These disorders are prolific.
An estimated 15 per cent of working-age adults have a mental disorder at any point in timeii. As of 2019, 301 million people around the world were living with anxiety; 280 million people were living with depression; and 64 million people were living with schizophrenia or bipolar disorderiii.
Compounding matters, the pandemic and subsequent public health interventions acted like an accelerant on what was already a smoldering fire. For instance, the Household Pulse survey in the U.S. revealed sharp rises in the number of adults suffering anxiety (from 31.4 per cent to 36.9 per cent) and depressive disorders (from 24.5 per cent to 30.2 per cent)iv.
Rates of depression rose sharply in Australia, as well, from a pre-COVID-19 baseline of around 10 per cent of the population to nearly 30 per cent (27.6 per cent)v. Anxiety also rose, from 13 per cent to 21 per cent, according to OECD data.
Frontline workers, particularly healthcare professionals, were hardest hit. In the earliest days of the pandemic, a survey of critical care healthcare workers in Australia and New Zealand found that between a fifth and a third of respondents reported moderate to extremely severe depression, anxiety, and stress symptomsvi.
A subsequent poll of 10,000 Australian healthcare workers found anxiety, burn out, and depression rates of 61, 58, and 28 per cent respectivelyvii.
So acute was the crisis that respondents confessed to planning to leave the profession outright.
Nor is the pandemic the only trigger of increasing mental health disorders. Disordering society-level events, experts note, influence mental health and work, as well. Economic recessions or other emergencies elicit risks such as job loss, financial instability, organizational restructuring, reduced employment opportunities, increased unemployment, and increased work without full-time or formal contracts.
What’s worse, the size and scope of this public health problem are far greater than the volume of investments outlaid to address it. As employers now find themselves on the frontlines of the mental health crisis, this guide addresses best-practice interventions organizations can deploy to develop mentally healthy workplaces protective of worker productivity.
The first step towards developing mentally healthy workplaces is removing psychosocial risks. What are psychosocial risks?
They are the hazards likeliest to affect workers’ psychological response to work and workplace conditions. The full list includesviii:
Demands of the job, control in the work environment, resources provided, the level of work engagement, the characteristics of the job, and potential exposure to trauma.
Support from colleagues and managers, the quality of interpersonal relationships, effective leadership, and the availability of manager training.
Changes to the organization, support from the organization, recognizing and rewarding work, how justice is perceived in an organization, a psychosocial safety climate, positive organizational climate, and a safe physical environment.
The degree to which conflicting demands from home, including significant life events, interfere with work.
Genetics, personality, early life events, cognitive and behavioral patterns, mental health history, lifestyle factors and coping style.
Workplaces that have mitigated or controlled these risks begin to take on the attributes of mentally healthy places of work.
That means work there is designed and managed to minimize harm. Protective factors (of which we’ll discuss later) are promoted at an organizational level to maximize resilience. And as a result, personal resilience is enhanced.
Early help-seeking is also promoted and facilitated in such workplaces, as is recovery from mental illness.
Finally, mentally healthy workplaces tout increased awareness and reduced stigma of mental illness.
Developing such workplaces isn’t easy, though. Indeed, formidable challenges stand in the way.
The geographic fragmentation of workforces, for one, has created stark barriers to business leaders gaining the situational awareness needed to ensure employee mental health and wellbeing. Bullying, particularly deleterious to mental health, has flourished in the remote work environmentix.
That’s not all. Even before the takeoff in remote work, the way oversight of wellbeing and mental health management processes were distributed within the organization also created issues. Safety teams, stewards of safety outcomes, were often kept out of the loop, even though poor mental health itself is a key factor in poor physical safety outcomes.
Still to this day at most organizations, Mental Health/ Wellbeing and Safety Management represent separate initiatives. They are managed by different departments, with different budgets, metrics, and incentives.
Worker mental health (specifically) and wellbeing and wellness initiatives (more generally) are traditionally handled by HR and/or a combination of third-party resources, including employee assistance programs (EAPs).
However, crucial to establishing mentally healthy workplaces is having Safety involved. Safety teams have the technical know-how to implement best-practice wellbeing initiatives as well as experience influencing workers.
But what should these initiatives look like? That’s where expert guidance comes in handy.
The World Health Organization, for its part, recently issued relevant guidance, a long list of expert guidelines on mental health at work. There, scholars tackle the thorny issue of universal organizational interventions that Safety leaders can implement to boost mental health outcomes among their workers.
What makes the guidance so valuable is that it relays how proposed interventions have been tested against real-world psychosocial risks to determine their effectiveness. This guide will lay out the most salient findings, to give employers a basis to begin pursuing (or upgrading) mental health and wellbeing programs.
The biggest finding was that job content/task design and job/task rotation demonstrated positive effects on mental health symptoms (stress/burnout). In the following circumstances, that means:
The guidelines also tested certain workplace interventions to determine whether they do indeed modify, mitigate, or remove some of the work-related psychosocial risks to mental health conditions cited above.
Such planned actions typically target working conditions with the aim of preventing deterioration in mental health, physical health, quality of life, and work-related outcomes. They include:
Do the actions work? Often the data are inconclusive. But in certain instances, experts can make recommendations. They follow below:
What about the start-up costs of getting such best-practice interventions off the ground? Clearly, organizations can’t afford to (nor should they) belabor implementation and tracking, especially in the face of an acute mental health crisis.
Here, advanced digital wellbeing management technologies can help businesses (1) respond to mental health and wellbeing events, (2) implement and track proactive initiatives to support their personnel, as well as (3) better understand the opportunities for mental health and wellbeing improvement. What capabilities in particular?
Besides that, the platforms in question provide tools for
all levels of the organization weighing in on wellbeing
questions. What does that look like?
Executives can oversee events and analytics. For their part,
line managers can manage events and launch initiatives
with centralized dashboards. And staff can access
wellbeing tools and content as well as also participate in
initiatives on any device.
Finally, employers might have once been reluctant to intervene in the personal lives of staff, but the size and scope of the mental health crisis prevents taking a back seat. Employers must act proactively, yet it’s even more important to act intelligently.
Fortunately, the availability of best-practice, scientifically tested guidelines, such as those prescribed by the WHO, takes the mystery out of what interventions to pursue.
Testing and tracking, however, remain vital, to determine whether interventions work at your organization. And that’s where integrated safety and wellbeing management platforms, like Noggin’s, can help.
These platforms help employers maintain a comprehensive view of both the wellbeing of their workers and the success of the wellbeing initiatives they pursue. Through various assessments, checks, analytics, and resources, employers manage both the physical and mental wellbeing of personnel across various locations and programs, to improve productivity, engagement, and retention.
i. World Health Organization: WHO guidelines on mental health at work. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052
ii. Ibid.
iii. Ibid.
iv. Heather R. Johnson, Psychiatry Advisor: Anxiety and Depression Increases During COVID-19 Highest Among Young Adults. Available at https://www.psychiatryadvisor.com/home/topics/anxiety/the-number-of-adults-with-symptoms-of-anxiety-or-depression-increasedduring-covid-19/.
v. OECD, OECD Policy Response to Coronavirus (COVID-19): Tackling the mental health impact of the COVID-19 crisis: An integrated, whole-of-society approach. Available at https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/tackling-the-mental-health-impact-of-the-covid-19-crisis-an-integratedwhole-of-society-response-0ccafa0b/.
vi. Naomi E. Hammond et al., Australian Critical Care: Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on critical care healthcare workers’ depression, anxiety, and stress levels. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762707/.
vii. Margaret Paul, ABC News: Coronavirus pandemic causing anxiety, burnout in most of Australia’s healthcare workers. Available at https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-16/survey-of-healthcare-workers-mental-health-issues-coronavirus/12772062.
viii. Dr. Samuel B Harvey et al, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales: Developing a mentally healthy workplace: A review of the literature: A report for the National Mental Health Commission and the Mentally Healthy Workplace Alliance. Available at http://affinityhealthhub.co.uk/d/attachments/developing-a-mentally-healthy-workplace-final-november-2014-1476727013.pdf.
ix. Joanna York, BBC: How workplace bullying went remote. Available at https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220819-how-workplace-bullying-went-remote.