Fill in the form below and we will contact you shortly to organised your personalised demonstration of the Noggin platform.
An integrated resilience workspace that seamlessly integrates 10 core solutions into one, easy-to-use software platform.
The world's leading integrated resilience workspace for risk and business continuity management, operational resilience, incident & crisis management, and security & safety operations.
Explore Noggin's integrated resilience software, purpose-built for any industry.
Emergency Management Software
Published May 19, 2021
The emergency response plan constitutes a set of written procedures for dealing with emergencies. The goal of emergency response planning is to minimise the impact of an emergency and to facilitate recovery.
Why is undertaking the exercise important, though? Developing an emergency response action plan is crucial to minimising (or avoiding) damage (altogether), protecting workers and communities – even saving lives.
Why’s that? Well, planning how to respond to emergencies ensures that all parties involved know what to do when an emergency does happen. And in this age of critical threats, emergencies are likelier to happen than ever.
Not only do emergency response plans help organisations and agencies respond more efficiently, but the emergency response planning process itself often reveals structural deficiencies that can be rectified before emergencies happen in the first place.
But to do so, serious work must be done throughout the lifecycle of emergency preparedness. That lifecycle comprises the following steps:
Who executes emergency response planning throughout the above stages? In many outfits, emergency response planning falls under the purview of the larger emergency management hierarchy whose goal it is to make timely, comprehensive, and effective decisions during emergency events.
In most emergency management structures, including the Incident Command System and Australasian Inter-Service Incident Management System, the Incident Commander will sit at the top of this hierarchy. The Incident Commander is the role given final decision-making authority over command and control. The purview of the role also extends to setting up the incident response organisation, as well as activating, escalating, and terminating processes.
Other roles should figure in the command-and-control structure, as well. To be effective, the structure ought to be set up so that that Incident Commander can efficiently delegate authority as dictated by the pace and scale of the incident. Those subordinating roles and responsibilities are likely to cover the following functions:
The planning section deserves special comment. The head of this section, the Planning Section Chief, collects situation and resources status information, evaluates it, and processes the information for use in developing plans. Other major responsibilities include:
What emergency response tools are available to the Planning Section Chief? Well, at the Chief’s disposal are Resources, Situation, Documentation, and Demobilisation Units. Each carries out a specific function during the emergency response:
Indeed, the work the Planning Section does constitutes a continuous process. That process requires integrating planning and response efforts often at large scale, i.e., encompassing local and national programmes.
For that reason, emergency response checklists serve to complement incident action plans; certain emergency management software platforms come equipped with emergency response checklists out of the box. An example of such a checklist is below:
Emergency Management Checklist: Example |
|||||
Element |
Documented |
Functional |
Comments |
||
|
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
Statement of policy on emergency response |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan given appropriate authority by highest management level |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan is distributed to all that need to know |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan establishes the emergency response team |
|
|
|
|
|
The authority to declare a full evacuation is designated |
|
|
|
|
|
The authority to declare the emergency is "over" is designated |
|
|
|
|
|
All response personnel are medically fit to perform their duties |
|
|
|
|
|
The following functions have been clearly defined and assigned to individuals: |
|||||
– Plan administration |
|
|
|
|
|
– Operational control |
|
|
|
|
|
– Coordination of support |
|
|
|
|
|
– Plan maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
– Regular risk assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
– Training |
|
|
|
|
|
– Drills and exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
– Maintenance of equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
– Specific response functions |
|
|
|
|
|
– Coordination of off site plans |
|
|
|
|
|
Alternates for all key positions exist |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan is based on current risk assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan provides for annual drills and exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan establishes various levels of emergencies with levels of response |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan includes basic elements: |
|||||
– Evacuation procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
– Shutdown procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
– Employee roll call procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
– Rescue and medical duties |
|
|
|
|
|
– Reporting procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
– Fire prevention plan |
|
|
|
|
|
All types of risks are considered: |
|||||
– Natural |
|
|
|
|
|
– Man-made |
|
|
|
|
|
– Civil disorders |
|
|
|
|
|
All hazardous products are listed |
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment includes adverse impact to locations that may be off-site |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive incident investigation procedures exist |
|
|
|
|
|
Good housekeeping procedures exist |
|
|
|
|
|
Procedures exist for inspection or testing of critical equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
Procedures call for the review for compliance with: |
|||||
– Occupational Health and Safety Act for your jurisdiction |
|
|
|
|
|
– National Fire Code |
|
|
|
|
|
– National Electrical Code |
|
|
|
|
|
– Environmental Protection Act |
|
|
|
|
|
– Other applicable legal requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
Fire protection equipment is inspected per Fire Code |
|
|
|
|
|
Contractors are briefed about emergency response plans |
|
|
|
|
|
The plan establishes a command post and ensures: |
|
|
|
|
|
– Command post locations provide protection from hazards |
|
|
|
|
|
– The command post is adequately equipped |
|
|
|
|
|
– Provisions have been made for emergency power, light, utilities, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan provides for emergency response training and covers the following: |
|||||
– Emergency response training is based on specific hazards and response duties |
|
|
|
|
|
– Testing of knowledge and skills is conducted |
|
|
|
|
|
– Plan specifies type and frequency of training for each response function |
|
|
|
|
|
– Adequate training records are kept |
|
|
|
|
|
– Minimum training levels are defined |
|
|
|
|
|
– Training of first aid responders complies with legislation, at minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
A current inventory list of all equipment and supplies exists: |
|
|
|
|
|
– Maintenance and decontamination procedures are included |
|
|
|
|
|
– Equipment is tested as specified by the manufacturer |
|
|
|
|
|
– Equipment and supply needs are reviewed when changes occur |
|
|
|
|
|
– Contact lists for suppliers of emergency equipment and supplies maintained, updated and readily available |
|
|
|
|
|
– Respiratory equipment selection, use and maintenance comply with current standard |
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual aid agreements are in place: |
|
|
|
|
|
– Call lists and letters of agreement are up-to-date |
|
|
|
|
|
– Drills involving mutual aid have been held |
|
|
|
|
|
– Capabilities of community organizations have been reviewed and considered |
|
|
|
|
|
Communication procedures include: |
|||||
– Telephone/cell phones |
|
|
|
|
|
– Two-way radios |
|
|
|
|
|
– Intercom |
|
|
|
|
|
– Runners |
|
|
|
|
|
– Emergency numbers are posted at telephones/programmed in phones |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective detection systems are installed, such as: |
|||||
– Smoke detectors |
|
|
|
|
|
– Heat detectors |
|
|
|
|
|
– Remote substance monitors |
|
|
|
|
|
– Leak detectors |
|
|
|
|
|
– Process control alarms |
|
|
|
|
|
Detection devices undergo regular testing, inspection, maintenance and calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
Regular tests of the alarm systems are conducted |
|
|
|
|
|
Evacuation details involve: |
|
|
|
|
|
– At least two evacuation routes exist from each area |
|
|
|
|
|
– All emergency exits are properly marked |
|
|
|
|
|
– All employees are instructed in evacuation procedures |
|
|
|
|
|
– Maps and procedures are posted |
|
|
|
|
|
– Assembly areas are located at safe distances |
|
|
|
|
|
– All employees and visitors can be accounted for |
|
|
|
|
|
– Procedures address needs of person(s) with disabilities or those with issues tha may impact their reacting to the emergency signal or evacuation (e.g. hard of hearing, broken leg, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
– Temporary shelter or transportation is considered |
|
|
|
|
|
– The security function is defined |
|
|
|
|
|
– Facility access is controlled during an emergency |
|
|
|
|
|
– Traffic control has been considered |
|
|
|
|
|
– Pilferage and theft have been considered |
|
|
|
|
|
– High security risk areas have been identified |
|
|
|
|
|
– There are physical security devices |
|
|
|
|
|
The plan includes media relations before, during and after the emergency: |
|
|
|
|
|
– Public information documents exist |
|
|
|
|
|
– Those dealing with the media/public are trained |
|
|
|
|
|
– Contacts with the media are established and maintained |
|
|
|
|
|
– Media information is reviewed annually and updated |
|
|
|
|
|
– Procedures are in place to best inform or control the release of information to the public during an emergency |
|
|
|
|
|
– Names and information regarding the injured are restricted until appropriate to release to the public |
|
|
|
|
|
– Regular media releases are made during an emergency |
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|||||
– Emergency shutdown procedures exist and are followed |
|
|
|
|
|
– Responsibility for shutdown is assigned |
|
|
|
|
|
- Procedures and checklists have been developed and communicated |
|
|
|
|
|
– Diagrams and maps indicating critical components are immediately available |
|
|
|
|
|
– All critical components are clearly identified |
|
|
|
|
|
– Persons with special technological knowledge are available to help emergency personnel |
|
|
|
|
|
– An alternative location for continuing operations management is available |
|
|
|
|
|
– Resource list has been developed for sources of equipment, supplies, services or contractors |
|
|
|
|
|
– Agreements have been made with other facilities to continue production of products, where possible |
|
|
|
|
|
– Procedures are adequate to document all compensable losses |
|
|
|
|
|
– Procedures provide for preserving the incident scene for investigations |
|
|
|
|
|
– A safety plan is inplace before re-entry into affected areas |
|
|
|
|
|
Courtesy: Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety
The focus of an entity’s operational planning, the emergency response plan is a plan for responding to hazards. The plan defines the scope of necessary emergency preparedness and (broader) emergency management activities for both business-as-usual and complex operations.
What goes in the document? It includes:
What’s more, the precise form the plan takes depends on the needs and specificities of the entity, a product of governmental structure (for public entities) and/or the results of a risk assessment (for everyone else). Provided it fits the entity’s emergency management strategies, policies, resources, and capabilities, the emergency response plan format is a decision taken at the entity level.
Incident management structures rarely prescribe compliance with certain template formats, though policymakers might. What are the most common templates? They include:
Plan template structure |
Description |
What’s in its primary sections |
Traditional functional structure |
Most commonly used EOP (Emergency Operations Plan) format |
Basic plan. Provides an overview of the entity’s preparedness and response strategies. Describes expected hazards, outlines agency roles and responsibilities, and explains how the entity’s keeps the plan current. Functional annexes. Individual chapters that focus on missions (e.g., communications, damage assessment). Hazard-specific annexes. Describe the policies, situation, CONOPS, and responsibilities for particular hazards, threats, or incidents. Explain the procedures unique to that annex for a hazard type. |
Emergency support function (ESF) |
Used in the National Response Framework (NRF) |
Basic plan. Provides an overview of the entity’s emergency management system. Explains the hazards faced, capabilities, requirements, and the entity’s emergency management structure. Unique annexes. Describe the framework through which an entity’s departments and agencies, the private sector, not-for-profit and voluntary organizations, and other nongovernmental organisations coordinate and execute the common emergency management strategies. Individual ESF annexes. Identify the ESF coordinator and the primary and support agencies for each function. Separate support or incident annexes. Describe the policies, situation, CONOPS, and responsibilities for particular hazards, threats, or incidents. |
Agency-/department-focused format |
Addresses each department’s or agency’s tasks in a separate section, enabling EOP users to review only procedures specific to their agency |
Basic plan. Works similarly to the above. Lead and support agency sections. Discuss the emergency functions completed by individual departments, agencies, and nongovernmental partners. Hazard-specific procedures. Describe the policies, situation, CONOPS, and responsibilities for particular hazards, threats, or incidents. |
Finally, planning before, during, and after an emergency event is crucial to the response effort. That’s why most emergency management organisations (and the frameworks they follow) accord so much responsibility to planning.
Planners are often helped in their role by emergency management software, as well. Platforms like Noggin Emergency give Planning Sections all the tools needed to effectively manage emergencies, through the entire lifecycle of preparation, response, and recovery as well as business-as-usual operations for emergency preparedness and critical infrastructure resilience.
How so?
For starters, these platforms are designed with NIMS/ICS and AIIMS best practices in mind – from standard forms to resource types to infrastructure maps and team structures. Relevant workflows go that critical last mile to automate key steps.
Not only that, but the relevant systems also support user interfaces, simplified to just the tools needed, reducing the cost and need for training. Plans, checklists, and role responsibilities help guide staff, so they can focus on the bigger picture during an incident.
But that’s not even the half of it. See what else Noggin Emergency can do by requesting a demonstration.
Sources:
ICS Organizational Structure and Elements: Extracted from - E/L/G 0300 Intermediate Incident Command System for Expanding Incidents, ICS 300. Available at https://training.fema.gov/emiweb/is/icsresource/assets/ics%20organizational%20structure%20and%20elements.pdf.
John R. Harrald and Theresa Jefferson: Shared Situational Awareness in Emergency Management Mitigation and Response. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221182988_Shared_Situational_Awareness_in_Emergency_Management_Mitigation_and_Response.