Fill in the form below and we will contact you shortly to organised your personalised demonstration of the Noggin platform.
An integrated resilience workspace that seamlessly integrates 10 core solutions into one, easy-to-use software platform.
The world's leading integrated resilience workspace for risk and business continuity management, operational resilience, incident & crisis management, and security & safety operations.
Explore Noggin's integrated resilience software, purpose-built for any industry.
Resilience Management Software
Updated November 5, 2024
In most organizations, resilience is likely to be a new focus. Propelled by the experience of Covid-19, many entities, whether in the private or public sector, are turning to newly minted Chief Resilience Officers (CROs) to come in and build an organizational resilience capability from the ground up.
The responsibility is immense, not only leading crisis management but also stewarding the business continuity/disaster resilience, incident response, cybersecurity, and risk management functions, too. Compounding the challenges, there simply hasn’t been that much practical guidance on how to bring together a wide array of stakeholders to help build support for resilience building.
Not anymore. The international standard-making body, ISO (International Organization for Standardization) recently published guidelines for developing such a resilience capability. Put together, the recommendations constitute the bulk of ISO 22336, the international body’s first standard dedicated to resilience policy and strategy.
How does it differ from business resilience standard, ISO 22316?
Well, ISO 22316 articulated the foundational principles for organizational resilience, establishing attributes that would demonstrate that an organization is resilient. Although important in its own right, ISO 22316 is far more theoretical than ISO 22336. ISO 22336 really gets in there, laying out how to build a resilience practice, step by painstaking step, at your organization.
Of course, anyone who reads ISO standards for a living, like we do, knows that they aren’t always the most digestible. Busy executives want the key components and to learn how to get started immediately. And that’s why we developed this guide, tailor-made for resilience executives looking to get the most out of ISO 22336. In it, you’ll learn:
Speed to the end if you want a fact sheet on what ISO 22336 is and how to get started working towards your organizational resilience goals.
What are we striving for? Given the rapid uptick in complex crises, all organizations are looking to achieve resilience.
But what is resilience exactly? The standard defines resilience as the strategic capability to anticipate and respond to change in order to survive and prosper.
Organizations achieve resilience by pursuing a resilience strategy. A key part of the overall organizational strategy, resilience strategy establishes objectives and corresponding activities in accordance with resilience policy.
What about resilience policy? Resilience policy sets the parameters for top management to embed resilience objectives into organizational strategies.
As you know very well, there’s no discrete resilience function within the wider organization; resilient organizations have built resilient structures into the foundation of the enterprise. Resilient organizations all share the following attributes, as well:
The resilience policy articulates the organization’s vision and purpose with respect to its strategic objectives and commitment to continual improvement. These are shared and understood by all parties.
The organization aligns its organizational resilience policy and strategy with its contexts, recognizing multiple interdependencies and interactions across all dimensions of the environment in which it achieves its objectives.
The potential for changes in the organizational context is central to an effective resilience policy and to influence future conditions.
The resilience policy confirms top management commitment to a diverse culture at all levels of the organization.
The organization anticipates, identifies, absorbs, and manages change, and effectively manages risk to consistently deliver on its commitments.
The organization shares information and knowledge and implements systems so that personnel are appropriately equipped to perform their roles.
The organization assigns roles to evaluate the effectiveness of the strategy design to achieve continual improvement, so that performance management criteria are responsive to change.
The organization allocates adequate resources and systems to support the effective implementation of the resilience strategy. These resources are available when required and their suitability and application routinely reviewed.
The organization assigns responsibility to coordinate the resilience activities in the governance structure and defines roles and responsibilities, so that the purpose of the resilience-enhancing activities is understood and decision-making is effective.
Those responsible for designing and implementing the strategy come from different areas of the organization and cover all aspects of the business, contributing a diversity of skills, knowledge, experience, and leadership capabilities.
The organization aligns and coordinates systems and eliminates silos that create barriers among functions as the strategy is implemented to facilitate the sharing of information and skills throughout the organization.
How to get to the promised land of resilience, though? CROs have to work through the lifecycle of resilience policy. And ISO 22336 at its best lays out exactly what that lifecycle consists of.
Fortunately for us, the lifecycle of resilience policy only includes three elements: formulation, design, and implementation.
Figure 1. The lifecycle of resilience policy
To what does each element refer?
This is the documentation of your intention to enhance resilience and assign accountability for deliverance of the strategy. During the documentation phase, organizations establish a policy that aligns organization’s values and behaviors with a shared vision and purpose.
This is the plan for a strategy that considers governance structure(s) and supports a multiplicity of skills, leadership, knowledge, and experience.
This is the how you can effectively manage risk and adapt to change. During this stage, organizations provide adequate resources to implement the strategy and consider how it can anticipate, identify, absorb, and manage change, and coordinate and align systems.
Throughout the course of this guide, we detail each component.
An organization will formulate its resilience policy by considering what the objectives and expectations of that policy will be. However, the resilience policy, once formulated, is simply a high-level statement of the organization’s intention and direction for enhancing resilience.
Resilience policy itself:
In formulating resilience policy, an organization must consider its context, both internal and external. That means the organization must continually scan its contexts and the multiple system elements that influence the delivery of its objectives to identify potential changes that can impinge upon organizational resilience. Those contexts include:
Internal context |
External context |
|
|
To reiterate, the organization, as part of the policy formulation process, will have to examine its current internal, interdependency, interaction, and external environment to determine vulnerabilities and opportunities to achieve an enhanced state of resilience. From there, top management will go on to:
The final element of policy formulation is communication. Communication in this context involves sharing information about the established policy with certain audiences, i.e., those both internal and external to the organization including oversight bodies.
Communication is a capability all to itself, though. Indeed, part of your job as CRO likely includes helping your organization improve internal communications.
To that end, you should be looking to establish an approved approach to communication to facilitate awareness of the resilience policy and strategy. A combination of communication methods should be used so that messages are accessible and comprehensible by all interested parties.
Once policy is formulated, strategy must be designed to achieve the objectives of that policy. Starting with a gap analysis, top management will develop an appropriate strategy and implementation plan including annual action plans, time frames, and resource allocations. Top management will also be called on to develop and set objectives and align decision-making with the outcomes of the resilience policy.
One aspect of resilience strategy design to be particularly mindful of is embedding resilience objectives into new and existing organizational policies and strategies. This embedding of resilience objectives goes a long way towards creating a culture supportive of resilience – one of your ultimate goals as a CRO.
Of course, building and maintaining resilience are both cross-functional efforts. Designing the resilience-enhancing strategy, therefore, requires cross-functional collaboration, i.e., roping in staff across the organization regardless of position or role.
CROs might even need to seek out external parties, such as community representatives, customers, governments, supply-chain operators, even competitors. For its part, top management should consider the following when designing a resilience strategy:
What of the strategy itself? That strategy should accomplish these three things:
We’ll admit the previous two sections might have been a little theoretical, as discussions of policy and strategy can often be. The rubber really hits the road when it comes to implementing a resilience strategy and ensuring it remains up to snuff as the context shifts around and within your organization.
Here, the standard really excels in calling interested parties to remain engaged and aware. Starting with top management, stakeholders must be committed to the ongoing enhancement of resilience.
The standard also recommends creating a process for how to implement the resilience strategy. That process consists of identifying key products and services, customer segments/markets, channels, obligations, and financial/value-added outcomes.
That step might actually have been accomplished in the course of undertaking an operational resilience mapping exercise. If that’s the case, top management, once key products, services, and processes have been mapped, should establish the scope of the strategy implementation, i.e., what will the strategy cover, and then develop an associated action plan to deliver on strategy objectives. That plan should accomplish the following:
As noted, top management must allocate the necessary resources to support capabilities that enhance resilience for the plan to be successful. Such resources are likely to run the gamut from qualified personnel, information and knowledge management systems (e.g., operational resilience software), and professional development and training to intangibles like relevant processes and procedures.
The standard also hones in on the role of the resilience lead, appointed to facilitate, communicate, coordinate, and promote resilience initiatives. That’s likely to be you or a deputy you’ve tapped. The specific responsibilities of that role include:
Of course, maintaining resilience is an ongoing endeavor. Strategy once implemented can’t be neglected.
The standard, here, makes a point of emphasizing the need to evaluate the effectiveness of the resilience framework. It even urges organizations to create clear objectives and adequate key performance indicators to frequently gauge strategy implementation progress, providing a set of relevant questions to ask to evaluate the success of the implementation. Questions include:
The importance of reporting is a main takeaway of this section of the standard. As aforementioned, the resilience lead will be responsible for reporting on the program’s implementation to top management. The purpose of these reports is to ensure continual improvement of the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the process. What specifically should the reports accomplish? They should:
Resilience itself depends on your company’s internal and external context, both of which will change over time – sometimes dramatically, more often imperceptibly. As conditions change, so too must your resilience capabilities. If they don’t, they will degrade and become increasingly irrelevant.
How to stay on top of resilience arrangements once implemented? That’s where monitoring and review come in handy. These strategies must be continually reviewed so that:
Finally, as a CRO, you know better than anyone how challenging it is to develop a resilience function at your organization.
With ISO 22336, you’re not alone in that resilience-building effort. And so, we’ve sought to explain what’s in the standard, so that you can quickly get to the work of building out or enhancing your strategic capability to anticipate and respond to change to survive and prosper.
Need a tear-away sheet, so that your team can start implementing ISO 22336 guidance today? Just print out and use the one below.
The ISO 22336:2024 standard offers comprehensive guidance to help organizations develop, implement, and maintain resilience policies and strategies. The standard addresses the need for integrating resilience into core business functions by aligning policies with the broader risk landscape, fostering interdependencies, and promoting continual improvement.
Organizations must analyze internal, external, and interaction contexts to understand the challenges they face. A resilience mindset drives strategic thinking and supports proactive decision-making systems, allowing businesses to respond effectively to disruptions.
A resilience policy defines the organization's approach to building resilience. The strategy outlines specific objectives and actions aligned with organizational goals. The standard promotes consistency between resilience objectives, strategies, and business processes to ensure alignment across all departments.
A successful resilience program must be integrated into existing organizational strategies and governance frameworks, such as business continuity, crisis management, information security, and other related programs. Policies need to reflect the consideration of risk and opportunities for improvement, ensuring that resilience remains dynamic and responsive.
Internal, external, and interdependency contexts are essential to understanding vulnerabilities. The ISO framework encourages organizations to map interdependencies, including suppliers, partners, and critical functions, to ensure resilience across the entire value chain.
The standard emphasizes the importance of strategy implementation through measurable objectives and the use of feedback mechanisms. Organizations must promote continual improvement by regularly reviewing policies, testing resilience measures, and incorporating lessons from past incidents.