We’ve discussed the National Incident Management System (NIMS) in this venue before. The widespread benefits introduced by NIMS led to the development of similar structures outside of the U.S. So, what do we stand to learn by understanding those structures?
In New Zealand, emergency services organisations use the Coordinated Incident Management System (CIMS) framework. Indeed, its use is mandated by law, specifically the nation’s Civil Defence Emergency Management Act, whose tenets are now associated with the national Civil Defence Emergency Plan Order.
Like NIMS in the U.S. and AIIMS in Australasia, CIMS enables emergency personnel to respond more effectively to incidents by better coordination across various functions and organisations. The specific mechanisms by which it does so include:
Being so flexible gives CIMS broad applicability to all types of incidents – unplanned emergencies and planned events, such as celebrations, parades, concerts, and official visits.
In that respect, too, CIMS resembles NIMS and AIIMS, both of which can be used to provide effective management to the following:
Many other principles and characteristics of CIMS (including flexibility and unity of effort) are also similar to those of NIMS and AIIMS.
CIMS, however, does stand out in a few crucial respects. And understanding why might be beneficial to emergency services outside of New Zealand.
Responsiveness to community needs, for instance, is a core CIMS principle – and it is more important than ever as the emergency threat spreads. Practitioners, as such, are taught that their response efforts should mitigate and manage the consequences of an incident on the affected individuals, families/whānau and communities, including animals.
To that end, response personnel must recognise an individual’s rights, treat individuals with fairness and dignity, and ensure the needs of affected people and animals are identified and met throughout the response and into recovery.
What’s more, communities must be able to actively participate in a response rather than wait passively for assistance. To allow this to occur, response personnel need to effectively communicate with communities to understand, integrate, and/or align the community response.
Another CIMS highlight is the emphasis on lead and support agencies. What’s the difference?
To do so, support agencies might have to render assistance by repurposing their existing capabilities. How can they do so? Here, digital emergency management technology comes in handy. To learn what advantages these solutions can bring, download our guide, five reasons to upgrade your emergency management platform.